We have a new hero…Edward Snowden

The world woke up to the name of the NSA PRISM whistleblower over the weekend and his name is Edward Snowden. I take my hat off to him for bringing this totalitarian spying programme to the worlds attention. How can the leaders of the supposed free world carry out this spying on its citizens and justify it in the name of fighting terrorism? Quite simply, they can’t!

The only terrorists are our own governments, look at who they are backing in Syria for regime change as an example…Al Qaeda and Jabhat al Nusra. Or the apartheid state of Israel or the governments of Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain or Jordan who do not tolerate free speech or political opponents…yer really spreading democracy. If this is not a sign for citizens across the world to rise up against our political and corporate masters, who no longer represent us, I do not know what is!

image

Above is Edward Snowden, this is the face of a hero, along with Bradley Manning who is willing to stand up for what he believes in. I thank Glen Greenwald from the Guardian for bringing this to the attention of the British people and the people of the world. Imagine if Hitler had this technology? How many more millions would he have been able exterminate? I’ve said it before and I will say it again, Orwells 1984 was not meant to be an instruction manual!

image

The UK government and in particular Mr Scrotum face himself, Mr Hague, a known liar and war criminal who should be tried for treason and crimes against humanity, had this to say…

Hague added that it was “fanciful” and “nonsense” to suggest that GCHQ would work with an agency in another country to circumvent the law.

Lying to the British public again…There’s only one answer to that lie and that is “extraordinary rendition”. There is clear evidence that British intelligence agencies were not truthful about their involvement in this as well as torture. Also adding to the illegal detention and torture of Afghanistan nationals.

This is why secret courts were introduced by Hagues own government to cover this immoral action. We were told that widespread phone hacking was fanciful nonsense, until the Guardian broke the story. Lies, lies and more lies.

For over 20 years what went on at the Hillsborough disaster was covered up, the families of victims abused and misled with lies.

We were firmly told about the intelligence that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction, hence the justification to invade. That was and is ridiculous, look at Israel saying Iran are close to a nuclear bomb but the only nuclear armed country in the Middle East is Israel, who have not signed the NPT, Iran has.

Recent history is littered with examples of how those in government have misled the public and acted in a way contrary to law, or have simply turned a blind eye, after sitting on the evidence. The only fanciful deceitful nonsense is that spoken by William Hague. When are we going to hold these people to account? That time is upon us!

“If you are a law-abiding citizen of this country going about your business and your personal life you have nothing to fear”

One name which jumps to my mind is “Jean Charles de Menezes”

This is I think one of the most sinister statements ever made by a British politician. There is plenty of evidence that innocent people do have things to fear.

“But if you are a would-be terrorist or the centre of a criminal network or a foreign intelligence agency trying to spy on Britain you should be worried because that is what we work on and we are, on the whole, quite good at it.”

Is this liar for real?

What about the 7/7 Bomber that the intelligence services followed after meeting with a known terrorist, and decided not to follow up because they were not a threat? What about the Aurora shootings, Christopher Dorner, the Boston Bombings, Sandy Hook and the death of Lee Rigby. This PRISM programme is not for our safety but for power and control.

I call on anyone who reads this, for our children and their children, to resist and rise up against these liars. Write to your MP, talk to your friends and family. I’m a big believer that history repeats itself, lest not forget what Hitler did when he had people’s information.

What is a false flag?

A false flag event is where covert military or paramilitary operations are designed and executed to deceive the public and further a narrative and fuel propaganda. The operations appear as though they are being carried out by other groups or nations rather than by those who actually planned and executed them.

The recent Boston bombing has many oddities in the story and the video evidence has not been offered to the public. Other suspects involved but not followed up, the 2 brothers were involved with FBI for 2 years and an uncle involved with the CIA. Not forgetting the Saudi that was rushed out of the country and the fact that law enforcement, FBI and private contractors were running a drill at the same time.

The key part of this other than the lack of video evidence is running a drill at the same time of the attack. The same thing happened at 9/11, 7/7 and Sandy Hook. An attack is staged on the public, there is media and apparent public outcry and then laws will be enacted and freedoms withdrawn. This may sound like I should be wearing a tinfoil hat but if you do not believe any of the examples above, the Gulf of Tonkin should set the scene.

image

Ripped from Cracked

On the night of August 4, 1964, at the height of the tensions between the U.S. and North Vietnam, the communist navy made the bizarre decision to attack two American destroyers — the USS Turner Joy and the USS Maddox. The American ships were outside of North Vietnamese territory when they radioed that they were being attacked by three North Vietnamese torpedo boats.
Since this constituted an act of war, this meant that America had the right to invade Vietnam. Hours after the first radio message from the Maddox, President Johnson was on TV announcing that the communists had attacked us in international waters and asking for permission to make the beef real in Vietnam. The incident is often cited by historians as the key inciting event that started America’s involvement in Vietnam, and a few years ago, it was cited by the National Security Agency as utter b.s.

“These could be ships, or they could be kamikaze seagulls. But whatever, let’s declare war.”
In 2005, an NSA report on the records from the night of the Gulf of Tonkin incident concluded that the event was blown out of proportion on purpose, which is pretty significant, since the NSA was the one who did the initial blowing. According to the report, “It is not simply that there is a different story as to what happened; it is that no attack happened that night.” Yes, the North Vietnamese attack that started the Vietnam War didn’t actually happen, and American officials knew it almost immediately.

An hour after the battle, the commander of one of the destroyers sent a message that there might not have been a single Vietnamese boat in the area, explaining that “Freak weather effects on radar and overeager sonar men may have accounted for” the initial reports. When the sun rose on the gulf and there wasn’t a single shred of wreckage from the two torpedo boats they’d fired on and believed they’d sunk, it was pretty clear to everyone involved that the U.S. Navy had been playing with itself in the dark the night before.

Unfortunately, within 30 minutes of the imaginary attack, Johnson had already decided to retaliate. America had been aiding the South Vietnamese army for years, and they were just looking for an excuse to make their relationship official. While the Gulf of Tonkin attack was completely imaginary, there’s no telling how long it would take the North Vietnamese to actually attack them. So Johnson and the NSA said good enough and made a “conscious effort” to make it look like there was an attack.
So in light of the truth about the Tonkin incident, is it really so crazy to think that 9/11 was an inside job? Yes. Still crazy. In fact, the Gulf of Tonkin conspiracy makes such elaborate conspiracy theories seem even more unlikely (to the sane). It proves that you don’t need to orchestrate elaborate conspiracies to justify an unjust war. All you need is the ability to ignore 90 percent of the facts and focus on the ones that support the case for war. In that way, the Tonkin incident bears a much closer resemblance to the many intelligence oopsies that happened in the run up to the Iraq War.

So a false flag is an attack or just outright lying to the public to further an agenda, an agenda that would not be passed by the public under normal conditions. These people are the terrorists.